|
All checks were successful
CD / Build and push images (push) Successful in 3m14s
CI / Lint, typecheck, test (push) Successful in 2m31s
CI / Auth e2e pack (push) Successful in 3m21s
CI / Build container images (push) Has been skipped
CD / Deploy to Test (push) Successful in 9s
CD / Smoke tests against Test (push) Successful in 1m12s
CD / Promote to Int (push) Successful in 11s
Pond Admins can answer "what can X actually see/do here?" — load-bearing for trust in the grant system (permissions.md §UI obligations). - shared: `explainPageCapability` — the resolver's decision chain (deciding level + the single deciding grant), sharing one code path with the boolean `resolvePageCapability` (now a thin wrapper), so the trace can never diverge from real access. Unit-tested against the permissions.md worked examples. - api: `GET /ponds/:id/effective-permissions?subjectType=&subjectId=&pageId=` (Pond-Admin-gated, one pond only) resolves as the chosen subject (a user with their real Site-Admin flag, all signed-in users, or the public), optionally against a page, and returns the read + write outcome with the deciding rule enriched with subject/scope names. - web: `EffectivePermissionsInspector` in Pond Settings — pick a subject and optionally a page → see the resolved read/edit verdict, the level that decided it, and the deciding rule spelled out as a de/en sentence (reusing the #55 sentence renderer). Hidden from non-admins. - tests: explain-mode unit tests (worked examples + trace-matches-boolean); `inspector.e2e.db.test.ts` (deciding rule on a labelled page, pond-level base capability, public default-closed, Pond-Admin gating); a browser assertion in the access-rules pack. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwZ4jR4KFAPvpjWevfUGX1 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| de | ||
| en | ||