64f2deb40f
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9b7acab294 |
#232: plugin allowlist with SHA-256 hash pinning
All checks were successful
CI / Lint, typecheck, test (pull_request) Successful in 6m21s
CI / Build container images (pull_request) Successful in 3m59s
CI / Auth e2e pack (pull_request) Successful in 8m35s
CI / Import/export fidelity gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CD / Build and push images (push) Successful in 17s
CD / Deploy to Test (push) Successful in 14s
CD / Smoke tests against Test (push) Successful in 1m17s
CD / Promote to Int (push) Successful in 12s
CI / Build container images (push) Has been skipped
CI / Auth e2e pack (push) Successful in 8m27s
CI / Import/export fidelity gate (push) Successful in 58s
CI / Lint, typecheck, test (push) Successful in 6m30s
The install path records the SHA-256 of the delivered bundle ZIP (plugins.bundle_hash; pre-#232 installs show it as unknown until reinstalled). plugins.allowlist in instance_settings names permitted ids with their pinned hashes: empty (default) = not enforced, existing instances unchanged; non-empty = installs of unlisted or deviating bundles are rejected (plugin_not_pinned / plugin_hash_mismatch, 403), and an installed plugin outside the list or with a deviating hash does not load — absent from pond mount lists, frame/assets 404. Every rejection is audited (plugin.rejected, catalogue v1.5). A version bump changes the hash and therefore requires an explicit re-pin — the intended friction (ADR 0025). Admin UI shows observed vs pinned hash per plugin with pin/re-pin/unpin. Scope stated honestly in plugin-architecture.md: the pin answers "is this the reviewed bundle"; post-install disk tampering is platform integrity (ADR 0019), sandbox containment stays the sandbox's job. Hardening guide row + catalog advisory triage; residual risk R-03 resolved. e2e: empty-allowlist compatibility, pinned load, unpinned and tampered installs rejected and audited, pin drift blocks loading while the admin still sees the mismatch, version bump needs re-pin. Full api suite 101 files / 561 green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AUtYMxwTCMHG9mVHnwbFg8 |
|||
| da5fd7c770 |
#243: VS_NFD_MODE and the machine-readable hardening-profile catalog
All checks were successful
CI / Lint, typecheck, test (pull_request) Successful in 6m12s
CI / Build container images (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
CI / Auth e2e pack (pull_request) Successful in 8m29s
CI / Import/export fidelity gate (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CD / Build and push images (push) Successful in 31s
CD / Deploy to Test (push) Successful in 14s
CD / Smoke tests against Test (push) Successful in 1m29s
CD / Promote to Int (push) Successful in 14s
CI / Build container images (push) Has been skipped
CI / Lint, typecheck, test (push) Successful in 6m30s
CI / Auth e2e pack (push) Successful in 8m6s
CI / Import/export fidelity gate (push) Successful in 57s
The deployment declares through VS_NFD_MODE (off | marked | hidden | enforced, default off) how the application treats configuration that violates the VS-NfD reference profile — deploy-level like BACKUP_ALLOWED_TARGETS, so a compromised Site Admin cannot widen it. The catalog in shared (vs-nfd-profile.ts) is the single source of truth: every profile-relevant setting with a decidable compliant value, judgement calls in an explicit advisory list, and a fence test parsing the hardening guide's reference tables so neither can drift (pattern #201). The api evaluates the catalog against the typed settings registry and validated env and exposes mode + verdict on GET /admin/system/vs-nfd-profile; the admin settings view shows the card whenever the mode is not off. Display only — the treatments land with #244–#246 (ADR 0027, proposed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AUtYMxwTCMHG9mVHnwbFg8 |
